org.w3c.tag (thread)

[Agenda] 4 Nov 2002 TAG teleconference (meetings, arch doc, IRIEverywhere-27, URIEquivalence-15), Ian B. Jacobs
Summary of discussion TAG and www-tag on xlinkScope-23, XLink/HLi nk, Williams, Stuart
Possible issue: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack, Miles Sabin
- Re: Possible issue: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack, Rick Jelliffe
  - Re: Possible issue: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack, Miles Sabin
  - Re: Possible issue: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack, Miles Sabin
- Re: Possible issue: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack, Chris Lilley
  - Re: Possible issue: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack, Miles Sabin
    - Re: Possible issue: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack, Chris Lilley
    - Re: Possible issue: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack, Miles Sabin
- RE: Possible issue: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack, Dare Obasanjo
  - Re: Possible issue: XXE (Xml eXternal Entity) attack, Miles Sabin
[Publication] 29 Oct 2002 Arch Doc, Ian B. Jacobs
Use of fragment identifiers in XML, Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Use of fragment identifiers in XML, Chris Lilley
  - Re: Use of fragment identifiers in XML, Simon St.Laurent
    - Re: Use of fragment identifiers in XML, Chris Lilley
  - Re: Use of fragment identifiers in XML, Dan Connolly
    - Re: Use of fragment identifiers in XML, Simon St.Laurent
    - Are we elements or animals? (was: Use of fragment identifiers in XML), Aaron Swartz
[Issue IRIEverywhere-27] Should W3C specifications start promoting IRIs?, Ian B. Jacobs
[Minutes] 28 Oct 2002 TAG teleconf (arch doc, IRIEverywhere-27, xlinkScope-23), Ian B. Jacobs
- Urgency of IRIEverywhere-27, Paul Grosso
[Agenda] 28 Oct 2002 TAG teleconference, Ian B. Jacobs
how URIs take on meaning (2.6), Dan Connolly
Unecessary dependence between XPointer and DTD or W3C XML Schema, Eric van der Vlist
- RE: Unecessary dependence between XPointer and DTD or W3C XML Schema, Paul Cotton
- RE: Unecessary dependence between XPointer and DTD or W3C XML Schema, Eric van der Vlist
  - RE: Unecessary dependence between XPointer and DTD or W3C XML Schema, Eric van der Vlist
[Minutes] 21 October 2002 TAG teleconference, Ian B. Jacobs
more on URI equivalence, Larry Masinter
- Re: more on URI equivalence, Martin Duerst
[Agenda] 21 Oct 2002 TAG teleconf, Ian B. Jacobs
- Re: [Agenda] 21 Oct 2002 TAG teleconf, Dan Connolly
- Re: [Agenda] 21 Oct 2002 TAG teleconf, Larry Masinter
  - recent IETF naming specs [was: [Agenda] 21 Oct 2002 TAG teleconf], Dan Connolly
http URIs as names and scalability, Larry Masinter
- Re: http URIs as names and scalability, Miles Sabin
- Re: http URIs as names and scalability, Mark Baker
- Re: http URIs as names and scalability, Ben Hammersley
Re: Sticking another fork in the URI issue: equality vs. equivalence, Larry Masinter
- RE: Sticking another fork in the URI issue: equality vs. equivalence, Joshua Allen
Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Tim Bray
- Re: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Ann Navarro
  - Re: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Tim Berners-Lee
    - Re: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Tim Bray
    - Re: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Ann Navarro
- Re: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Jeni Tennison
- RE: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Ann Navarro
- RE: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Dare Obasanjo
  - Re: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Jeni Tennison
  - RE: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Rick Jelliffe
- RE: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Potential TAG issue in re consistency, Schema, etc., Simon St.Laurent
deepLinking-25 : What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act?, David Booth
- Re: deepLinking-25 : What to say in defense of principle that deep linking is not an illegal act?, Roy T. Fielding
Re: Sticking another fork in the URI issue, Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Sticking another fork in the URI issue, Paul Prescod
- Re: Sticking another fork in the URI issue, Simon St.Laurent
Towards Colloquial XML, Paul Prescod
Binary Infosets, Robin Berjon
- Re: Binary Infosets, Tim Bray
  - Re: Binary Infosets, Robin Berjon
- Re: Binary Infosets, Chris Lilley
  - Re: Binary Infosets, Martin Duerst
    - Re: Binary Infosets, Chris Lilley
    - Re: Binary Infosets, Robin Berjon
    - RE: Binary Infosets, yskim
    - Re: Binary Infosets, Martin Duerst
    - Re: Binary Infosets, Robin Berjon
    - Re: Binary Infosets, Robin Berjon
    - Re: Binary Infosets, Martin Duerst
    - Re: Binary Infosets, Robin Berjon
IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Jonathan Marsh
- Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Richard Tobin
  - Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Martin Duerst
- Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Jonathan Marsh
  - Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Chris Lilley
    - RE: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Julian Reschke
    - RE: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Rick Jelliffe
    - RE: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Julian Reschke
    - Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Chris Lilley
    - RE: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Julian Reschke
- Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Elliotte Rusty Harold
  - Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Chris Lilley
  - Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Martin Duerst
    - Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Martin Duerst
- Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Misha . Wolf
  - Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Elliotte Rusty Harold
    - Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Rick Jelliffe
    - Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Chris Lilley
- Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Misha . Wolf
- RE: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Biron,Paul V
  - Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Chris Lilley
  - Re: IRIs everywhere (including XML namespaces), Tim Bray
RE: what is this? was: Re: now://example.org/car, Champion, Mike
XHTML needs multi-ended links, Tim Bray
- Re: XHTML needs multi-ended links, Ann Navarro
  - Re: XHTML needs multi-ended links, Tim Bray
    - Re: XHTML needs multi-ended links, Ann Navarro
    - Re: XHTML needs multi-ended links, Ann Navarro
[Minutes] 7 Oct 2002 TAG teleconf (xlinkScope-23, arch doc, rfc3023Charset-21), Ian B. Jacobs
Summary of TAG activity from 4 Sep 2002 to 4 Oct 2002, Ian B. Jacobs
Re: examples as opportunity (was Re: XHTML & hyper...), Simon St.Laurent
"duri" as a URI-based URN scheme, Larry Masinter
- Generalization and opacity (was "duri" as a URI-based URN scheme), Mark Baker
- Re: "duri" as a URI-based URN scheme, Chris Lilley
- RE: "duri" as a URI-based URN scheme, Champion, Mike
- RE: "duri" as a URI-based URN scheme, Williams, Stuart
- RE: "duri" as a URI-based URN scheme, Dare Obasanjo
  - Re: "duri" as a URI-based URN scheme, Mark Baker
- RE: "duri" as a URI-based URN scheme, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: "duri" as a URI-based URN scheme, Champion, Mike
  - Re: "duri" as a URI-based URN scheme, Mark Baker
- RE: "duri" as a URI-based URN scheme, Graham Klyne
RE: Correction Re: The case against URNs, Champion, Mike
- RE: Correction Re: The case against URNs, Michael Day
- Re: Correction Re: The case against URNs, Tim Bray
- RE: Correction Re: The case against URNs, Champion, Mike
  - Re: Correction Re: The case against URNs, Jonathan Borden
RE: The case against URNs, Champion, Mike
- Re: The case against URNs, Paul Prescod
  - Re: The case against URNs, Jonathan Borden
- HTTP URIs need not be ambiguous, was Re: The case against URNs, Jonathan Borden
  - RE: HTTP URIs need not be ambiguous, was Re: The case against URNs, Bill de hÓra
- RE: The case against URNs, Champion, Mike
  - Re: The case against URNs, Paul Prescod
  - Re: The case against URNs, Jonathan Borden
RE: //example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Micah Dubinko
- RE: //example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Champion, Mike
  - The case against URNs, Paul Prescod
    - Correction Re: The case against URNs, Paul Prescod
- RE: //example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Champion, Mike
- RE: //example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Joshua Allen
now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Micah Dubinko
- RE: //example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), David Orchard
  - Re: //example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Mark Baker
    - RE: //example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), David Orchard
    - Re: //example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Mark Baker
    - RE: //example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), David Orchard
    - Re: //example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Mark Baker
- Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Graham Klyne
- RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Micah Dubinko
  - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Paul Prescod
  - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Roy T. Fielding
- RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Champion, Mike
  - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Jonathan Borden
    - what is this? was: Re: now://example.org/car, Jonathan Borden
    - Re: what is this? was: Re: now://example.org/car, Chris Lilley
    - Re: what is this? was: Re: now://example.org/car, Jonathan Borden
    - Re: what is this? was: Re: now://example.org/car, Dan Connolly
    - Re: what is this? was: Re: now://example.org/car, Jonathan Borden
    - Re: what is this? was: Re: now://example.org/car, Paul Prescod
    - Re: what is this? was: Re: now://example.org/car, Miles Sabin
    - Re: what is this? was: Re: now://example.org/car, Jonathan Borden
    - Re: what is this? was: Re: now://example.org/car, Miles Sabin
  - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Roy T. Fielding
  - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Mark Baker
  - RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Julian Reschke
    - RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Bill de hÓra
    - RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), David Orchard
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Paul Prescod
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Paul Prescod
    - RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Julian Reschke
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Paul Prescod
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Mark Baker
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Miles Sabin
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Paul Prescod
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Miles Sabin
    - RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), David Orchard
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Paul Prescod
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Roy T. Fielding
    - RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), David Orchard
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Roy T. Fielding
    - Sticking another fork in the URI issue, Tim Bray
    - Re: Sticking another fork in the URI issue, Ann Navarro
    - Re: Sticking another fork in the URI issue, Paul Prescod
    - RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), David Orchard
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Paul Prescod
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Jonathan Borden
- RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Champion, Mike
- RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Dare Obasanjo
  - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Jonathan Borden
- RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Dare Obasanjo
  - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Roy T. Fielding
  - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Jonathan Borden
    - RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), David Orchard
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Jonathan Borden
  - RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Bill de hÓra
- RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Joshua Allen
  - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Roy T. Fielding
- Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Simon St.Laurent
  - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Roy T. Fielding
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Simon St.Laurent
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Roy T. Fielding
    - Re: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Simon St.Laurent
- RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: now://example.org/car (was lack of consensus on httpRange-14), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Tim Bray
- RE: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Champion, Mike
  - Re: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Norman Walsh
  - Re: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Tim Bray
    - XLink and IE, actually ... was: Re: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Jonathan Borden
- RE: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Simon St.Laurent
  - Re: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Tim Bray
    - Re: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Simon St.Laurent
    - Re: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Tim Bray
    - examples as opportunity (was Re: XHTML & hyper...), Simon St.Laurent
    - Re: examples as opportunity, Norman Walsh
- RE: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Champion, Mike
  - Re: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Tim Bray
    - Re: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Chris Lilley
- RE: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Dare Obasanjo
- RE: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Champion, Mike
- Re: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), noah_mendelsohn
  - RE: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), David Orchard
  - Re: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), Paul Prescod
- RE: XHTML & hyperlinking opinions (long, sorry), noah_mendelsohn
Enhance XLink: infer xlink:type, Tim Bray
- Re: Enhance XLink: infer xlink:type, Ann Navarro
  - Re: Enhance XLink: infer xlink:type, Roy T. Fielding
    - Re: Enhance XLink: infer xlink:type, Ann Navarro
    - Re: Enhance XLink: infer xlink:type, Roy T. Fielding
    - Re: Enhance XLink: infer xlink:type, Ann Navarro
  - Re: Enhance XLink: infer xlink:type, Tim Bray
    - Re: Enhance XLink: infer xlink:type, Ann Navarro
Re: Is XHTML a dead end?, Norman Walsh
- Re: Is XHTML a dead end?, Jeni Tennison
  - Re: Is XHTML a dead end?, Norman Walsh
    - Re: Is XHTML a dead end?, Jeni Tennison
    - Re: Is XHTML a dead end?, Norman Walsh
    - Re: Is XHTML a dead end?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: Is XHTML a dead end?, Norman Walsh
- Re: Is XHTML a dead end?, Eric van der Vlist
  - Re: Is XHTML a dead end?, Norman Walsh
lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Simon St.Laurent
- Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Dan Connolly
  - Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Simon St.Laurent
    - Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Tim Bray
    - Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Tim Berners-Lee
    - Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Simon St.Laurent
  - Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Mark Baker
- Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Tim Bray
  - Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Simon St.Laurent
- Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Graham Klyne
  - RE: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, David Orchard
    - RE: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Graham Klyne
- RE: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Champion, Mike
- RE: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Williams, Stuart
  - RE: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, David Orchard
    - Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Roy T. Fielding
    - RE: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, David Orchard
    - RE: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Dan Connolly
- RE: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Joshua Allen
  - Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Roy T. Fielding
- Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Simon St.Laurent
  - RE: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Julian Reschke
    - RE: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Simon St.Laurent
  - Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Roy T. Fielding
    - Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Simon St.Laurent
    - Re: lack of consensus on httpRange-14, Roy T. Fielding
Re: rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6, Misha . Wolf
- RE: rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6, Julian Reschke
- RE: rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6, Misha . Wolf
- RE: rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6, Dare Obasanjo
Re: XLink: the architectural issue, Mark Nottingham
- Re: XLink: the architectural issue, Norman Walsh
  - Re: XLink: the architectural issue, Mark Nottingham
[Agenda] 7 Oct 2002 TAG teleconf, Ian B. Jacobs
- Re: [Agenda] 7 Oct 2002 TAG teleconf, Dan Connolly
[Minutes] 24-25 Sep TAG ftf meeting, Ian B. Jacobs
- Re: [Minutes] 24-25 Sep TAG ftf meeting, Ann Navarro
  - Re: [Minutes] 24-25 Sep TAG ftf meeting, Roy T. Fielding
    - Re: [Minutes] 24-25 Sep TAG ftf meeting, Ann Navarro
- rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6, Julian Reschke
  - Re: rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6, Tim Bray
Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Jonathan Borden
- Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Paul Prescod
  - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Jonathan Borden
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Paul Prescod
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Jonathan Borden
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Ann Navarro
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Norman Walsh
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Ann Navarro
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Norman Walsh
    - RE: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, David Orchard
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Paul Prescod
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Tim Bray
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Paul Prescod
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Jonathan Borden
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Paul Prescod
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Jonathan Borden
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Paul Prescod
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Jonathan Borden
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Norman Gray
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Norman Walsh
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Jeni Tennison
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Norman Walsh
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Jeni Tennison
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Norman Walsh
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Jeni Tennison
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Norman Walsh
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Jeni Tennison
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Norman Walsh
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Paul Prescod
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Norman Walsh
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Paul Prescod
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Paul Prescod
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Jonathan Borden
    - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Norman Walsh
  - RE: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Bill de hÓra
- RE: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, DPawson
  - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Tim Berners-Lee
- RE: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, DPawson
  - Re: Why not XHTML+RDF? was Re: Links are links, Tim Berners-Lee
Re: Minutes, Masayasu Ishikawa
- RE: Minutes, Williams, Stuart
Re: Links are links, Paul Prescod
- Re: Links are links, Ann Navarro