logo       

Re: Draft TAG Finding: Consistency of Formatting Properties: msg#00170

org.w3c.tag

Subject: Re: Draft TAG Finding: Consistency of Formatting Properties


Hello,

Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> In response to formattingProperties-19[1], I have published
> "TAG Finding: Consistency of Formatting Property Names, Values, and
> Semantics"[2].
> The TAG invites public comment on this draft finding.

I agree with this draft finding, but the following example in
section 1 [3] is bogus:

<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
font-family="serif"
font-size="18pt">
<html:p>Some HTML text</html:p>
<svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";>
<svg:g transform="scale(0.5)">
<svg:text>Some SVG text</svg:text>
...
</svg:g>
</svg:svg>
</html:div>

There's no 'font-family' or 'font-size' attributes in XHTML. Put
it the other way around, i.e. put XHTML inside SVG. SVG does have
those attributes.

And please never say HTML when you refer to XHTML.

> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#formattingProperties-19
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/formatting-properties.html

[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/formatting-properties.html#intro

Regards,
--
Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@xxxxxx
W3C - World Wide Web Consortium




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise