Re: Draft agenda: 24 June TAG teleconference (Arch document, WSA update)

+1.  It's always been my opinion, as a member of the XMLP/GETF and WSD, that
this ought to be addressed by WSDL 1.2.

Added as issue #61 [1].

BTW, it would help if WSDL issues were raised directly on
www-ws-desc@xxxxxxx

Jean-Jacques.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x61

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

> > I, and I think the TAG, agree with having a WSDL definition for a HTTP
> > GET-in/SOAP out binding that is orthogonal to the SOAP POST binding.
> > Could this be added to the WSDL issues list, as it sounds like
> > you are agreement as well.
>
> I'll be happy to, although that's already covered by the "support
> SOAP 1.2" requirement. Anyway, its worth calling it out specifically.