|
Re: [Minutes] 24 June 2002 TAG teleconference (Arch doc, qnameAsId-18, S: msg#00165org.w3c.tag
I am not speaking on behalf of the WSD WG; however, I would still like to point out that the WG is aware that WSDL may not support (all of) SOAP 1.2. The WG has indeed open an issue on this very topic [1]. Jean-Jacques. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x23 "Ian B. Jacobs" wrote: > TB: [...] I haven't seen an attempt to harmonize SOAP changes > in 1.2 and WSDL for how to do this. > DO: There's no example in the WSDL spec to show how this could > be done. [...] > TB: Maybe we don't have to figure out what to do. The WSDL guys > are the experts. Does it suffice to point out to them that: > 1.Some substantial changes to SOAP 1.2 > 2.There doesn't seem to be a way in WSDL to declare this > (and no examples illustrating this). > 3.Ask them to make necessary changes. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/24-tag-summary |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: My review of 0607 document: 00165, Jean-Jacques Moreau |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Draft agenda: 24 June TAG teleconference (Arch document, WSA update): 00165, Jean-Jacques Moreau |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Minutes] 24 June 2002 TAG teleconference (Arch doc, qnameAsId-18, SOAP/WSDL/GET)i: 00165, Michael Mealling |
| Next by Thread: | [Agenda] 1 July TAG teleconf (arch doc, qnames, formatting properties, URI equiv, RFC3023, SOAP/WSDL): 00165, Ian B. Jacobs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |