|
Re: Proposed TAG Finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in: msg#00134org.w3c.tag
From: "Tim Bray" <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Having said that, the assumption (that you can rely on access to schema > bindings) has now become sufficiently widespread that it may actually be > harmful to introduce new methods of establishing the binding, as > schematron does. -Tim Who does it harm? Why not treat it as established practise? Cheers Rick Jelliffe |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Bad practice: Overriding HTTP content-type with a URI reference: 00134, Martin Duerst |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Minutes] 17 June TAG teleconf (Infoset/PSVI, XLink, Style properties, Qnames, Mime registration): 00134, Ian B. Jacobs |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Proposed TAG Finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Contenti: 00134, Tim Bray |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Proposed TAG Finding: Using Qualified Names (QNames) as Identifiers in Content: 00134, james anderson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |