logo       

RE: Potential new issue: PSVI considered harmful: msg#00102

org.w3c.tag

Subject: RE: Potential new issue: PSVI considered harmful


Agreeing with the notion that validation and type augmentation
can/should be decoupled, what is wrong with the notion of pluggable
types other than creating yetAnotherPossiblyUnpredictableComponent?

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

On further consideration, I probably would back off my statement above;
for example, it seems just fine to refer to the XMl schema basic type
repertoire (or hopefully, a subset of it) by reference. The problem
that worries me here is where typing information comes from, and the
supposition that types exist only as a side-effect of validation
processing. -Tim




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise