logo       

RE: Potential new issue: PSVI considered harmful: msg#00101

org.w3c.tag

Subject: RE: Potential new issue: PSVI considered harmful


Tim Bray wrote:

> > [Dare Obasanjo] I agree that default values and type
> information are orthogonal but they both exist in the PSVI
> because it is the Post Schema Validation Infoset which means it
> includes everything that can be obtained from validating an XML document.
>
> Sigh. I'm arguing that both value defaulting and type annotation are
> orthogonal to the process of validation. Yes, this happens to be
> produced as a side-effect of validation - but I can imagine doing type
> annotation in a much more lightweight way than bringing a large complex
> declarative schema facility to bear. In fact, why shouldn't I just be
> able to jam something into the instance or infoset saying "this
> attribute here is an integer"?

Here's an example where an "infoset" is augmented with type information in
absence of DTD, XDR or XML Schema:

<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-property-datatypes-latest.html>




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise