|
FTP "type" declaration: msg#00080org.w3c.miscellaneous
Hi there, Apologies if you are not the person to mention this to. I just spotted a discrepancy in the FTP URI defintion on the addressing page on the W3C website. Background: In the FTP URI, you can include a statement at the end of the URI of the form ";type=<typecode>" to indicate what transfer more to use (e.g. ascii or "image" [binary]). On the W3C website [1] it states that the type should take the form: ;type = <type-code> ... The type code is in the format defined in RFC959... In RFC959 [2], the <type-code> is defined as: <type-code> ::= A [<sp> <form-code>] | E [<sp> <form-code>] | I | L <sp> <byte-size> Note these are all capital letters (A, E, I, L) so, for example to indicate using the "image" mode you would put: ;type=I However, in RFC1738[3], it states ...<typecode> is one of the characters "a", "i", or "d"... Here they are indicated as lower case. So anyway, there is a discrepancy here. Obviously I guess the simple answer is to go with RFC1738 as it is more recent. Just wondered if you had any input on this? Regards, John Wood [1] http://www.w3.org/Addressing/URL/4_1_FTP.html [2] http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc959/5_Declarative.html#z9 [3] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1738.html |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: SPARQL query to calendar Re: toIcal.py - failed attempt of using it: 00080, Dan Connolly |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: "Dr. H.A.F.M.O van Mierlo" example: 00080, Dan Connolly |
| Previous by Thread: | toIcal.py - failed attempt of using iti: 00080, Karl Dubost |
| Next by Thread: | Re: "Dr. H.A.F.M.O van Mierlo" example: 00080, Dan Connolly |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |