|
Re: [w3c-html-cg] <none>: msg#00075org.w3c.miscellaneous
On Wednesday, November 22, 2006, 4:59:40 PM, Dean wrote: DJ> Hi Chris, Steve, DJ> Maciej, Ian and David have given useful feedback on the HTML WG DJ> charter. What is the process by which this feedback is considered? Its considered like any other feedback - we take it into account and tell them what we did about it. DJ> Does it have to wait until it is submitted by the AC review? No. Although, if their AC rep does send in a copy, its clearer that its the position of an organization not an individual. DJ> If some of the feedback is accepted then it might be a significant DJ> change to the charter. DJ> Does this mean an extra round of AC review is DJ> required? Possibly. DJ> Or, if everyone "here" agrees, is it possible to change the charter DJ> currently under review? No, not now its gone out. Don't change it in-place. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@xxxxxx Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | toIcal.py - failed attempt of using it: 00075, Karl Dubost |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: toIcal.py - failed attempt of using it: 00075, Dan Connolly |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: HTML WG charter review, tracking feedbacki: 00075, Maciej Stachowiak |
| Next by Thread: | XBL 2.0 HTML disposition of comments script: 00075, Anne van Kesteren |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |