Re: Re:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:58:29 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile  
<chaals@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:27:16 +0100, T.V Raman <raman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I concurr with Steve, and strongly disagree with the later
> > suggestion on this thread that two parallel versions of the
> > charter be maintained with a pointer being passed around to the
> > alternative --- I for one would not feel comfortable voting on
> > either  version of any of the charters if that were the case.
>
> I agree with Raman that having made the proposals they should stand. I  
> am disappointed that the feedback that various people including myself  
> raised seemed to have been ignored in the proposal, but W3C is like  
> that. I will make the same suggestions in my AC review, as significant  
> change requests.

Hmm. I don't know which charter drafts I was reading. Some of the most  
significant changes I requested most strongly were in fact made in the  
proposal.

cheers

Chaals

--
  Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
  hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@xxxxxxxxx          Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com