|
Re: HTML WG charter review, tracking feedback: msg#00060org.w3c.miscellaneous
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 02:59 +1100, Dean Jackson wrote: > Hi Chris, Steve, > > Maciej, Ian and David have given useful feedback on the HTML WG > charter. What is the process by which this feedback is considered? > > Does it have to wait until it is submitted by the AC review? > > If some of the feedback is accepted then it might be a significant > change to the charter. Does this mean an extra round of AC review is > required? > > Or, if everyone "here" agrees, is it possible to change the charter > currently under review? Good questions. I advise that you - leave the charter under review stable during the review - maintain another draft where you integrate feedback as you see it. Share this other draft with whoever you see fit. In particular, give a pointer to it when you reply to Maciej, Ian and David. Oh... they're all copied here, I see. And www-archive is copied. Hello, fishbowl! Whee! Perhaps the charter under review should be tweaked just slightly, to note the presence of the other draft with a link. > [I'm not sure who is included in "here" - the people that have > replied so far? the entire list of people cc-ed?] > > Dean > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re:: 00060, Steve Bratt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Charters for review: 00060, Dan Connolly |
| Previous by Thread: | Re:i: 00060, Chris Lilley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: HTML WG charter review, tracking feedback: 00060, John Boyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |