|
Re: Validation of XHTML 1.0 Strict, application/xhtml+xml: msg#00040org.w3c.miscellaneous
On Nov 10, 2006, at 13:35, Karl Dubost wrote: http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/html5/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.la- grange.net%2F2006%2F10%2F05 Messages are better if the document was XHTML 5 but it is not. That interface (the one with /html5/ in the URI) is for checking if the input is a conforming HTML5 document or a conforming XHTML5 document (subject to both the spec and the service being unfinished). The validation still failed, Though the document is correct. The document is not correct XHTML5, which is what that interface in checking. The document is correct XHTML 1.0 Strict, though: http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.la-grange.net% 2F2006%2F10%2F05&schema=http%3A%2F%2Fhsivonen.iki.fi%2Fxhtml-schema% 2Fxhtml-strict.rng+http%3A%2F%2Fhsivonen.iki.fi%2Fxhtml-schema% 2Fxhtml-strict.sch+http%3A%2F%2Fhsivonen.iki.fi%2Fxhtml-schema% 2Fexclude%2Fbasic.rng+http%3A%2F%2Fhsivonen.iki.fi%2Fxhtml-schema% 2Fexclude%2Fform.rng+http%3A%2F%2Fhsivonen.iki.fi%2Fcheckers%2Fall%2F -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@xxxxxx http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Validation of XHTML 1.0 Strict, application/xhtml+xml: 00040, Karl Dubost |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Draft] Process Suggestion: EO in TR: Don't: 00040, Sean B. Palmer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Validation of XHTML 1.0 Strict, application/xhtml+xmli: 00040, Karl Dubost |
| Next by Thread: | [Fwd: Re: [rest-discuss] RFC for REST?]: 00040, Dan Brickley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |