logo       

Re: on application/xml and RDF statements vs pictures of statements: msg#00006

org.w3c.miscellaneous

Subject: Re: on application/xml and RDF statements vs pictures of statements


I didn't see this finding mentioned anywhere, but it seems to me to be
germane to most of the issues brought up in this discussion;

http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect

Mark.

On 11/2/06, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 02/11/06, Dan Connolly <connolly@xxxxxx> wrote:
> we figure they're statements. Details attached.


Nov 02 12:20:23 <DanC> because in some sense, when you fire up an RDF
tool, you the consumer are saying "never mind what the author told the web;
I'm willing to take the risk that he meant RDF"

This seems reasonable to a (distinct) point. Local interpretation of the
material is fine, republication of the material is troublesome. With "never
mind...", any provenance chain is broken.

Cheers,
Danny.



--

http://dannyayers.com




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise