Re: on application/xml and RDF statements vs pictures of statements

On 02/11/06, Dan Connolly <connolly@xxxxxx> wrote:

we figure they're statements. Details attached.

Nov 02 12:20:23 <DanC>    because in some sense, when you fire up an RDF tool, you the consumer are saying "never mind what the author told the web; I'm willing to take the risk that he meant RDF"

This seems reasonable to a (distinct) point. Local interpretation of the material is fine, republication of the material is troublesome. With "never mind...", any provenance chain is broken.

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 

http://dannyayers.com