|
|
May 29, 2008
- meeting record: 2008-05-29 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force, Ralph R. Swick
- Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion, Mark Birbeck
- Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion, Dan Brickley
- Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion, Ralph R. Swick
- Re: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues), Benjamin Nowack
- Re: Implementation issue with TC#78, Ivan Herman
- RE: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 29 May 2008, 1500 UTC, Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: Implementation issue with TC#78, Manu Sporny
- Re: Implementation issue with TC#78, Mark Birbeck
- librdfa fully conformant - passes 86/86 Test Cases, Manu Sporny
- Re: telecon, Micah Dubinko
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 29 May 2008, 1500 UTC, Manu Sporny
- telecon, Ben Adida
- Implementation issue with TC#78, Manu Sporny
May 28, 2008
- Re: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues), Manu Sporny
- RE: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues), Seaborne, Andy
- Re: [RDFa TC] Update, Manu Sporny
- Re: RDFa functional spec, Micah Dubinko
- Re: [RDFa TC] Update, Manu Sporny
- Re: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues), Ivan Herman
- Re: Using RDFa to produce self-describing HTML, Dan Connolly
- RE: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues), Seaborne, Andy
- Re: crazy ivan question? (sparql.org issues), Manu Sporny
- RE: Crazy Ivan update, Hausenblas, Michael
- Crazy Ivan update, Manu Sporny
- Using RDFa to produce self-describing HTML, Steven Pemberton
- Re: RDFa functional spec, Steven Pemberton
- RE: crazy ivan question?, Hausenblas, Michael
- RE: Test #53, Hausenblas, Michael
- crazy ivan question?, Ivan Herman
- Test #53, Ivan Herman
May 27, 2008
- Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion, Ivan Herman
- Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion, Shane McCarron
- Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion, Ivan Herman
- Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion, Shane McCarron
- Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion, Manu Sporny
- Re: [RDFa TC] Update, Toby A Inkster
- Re: ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion, Ivan Herman
- Re: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa TC] Update, Ivan Herman
- ISSUE-103: substantive issue that requires opinion + discussion, Ben Adida
May 26, 2008
- RE: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases, Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases, Manu Sporny
- RE: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases, Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases, Ben Adida
- Bnode issues with 16 approved test cases, Manu Sporny
- Re: RDFa Primer ready for Working Group review, Ben Adida
- Re: [RDFa TC] Update, Manu Sporny
- Re: [RDFa] Comments on the RDFa Primer, Ben Adida
- Re: RDFa Primer -- some comments, Ben Adida
- Re: RDFa Primer ready for Working Group review, Ben Adida
- [RDFa TC] Update, Hausenblas, Michael
May 24, 2008
- TC#103 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated, Manu Sporny
- TC#102 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated, Manu Sporny
- TC#101 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated, Manu Sporny
- TC#100 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated, Manu Sporny
- TC#94 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated, Manu Sporny
- TC#92 is incorrect, SPARQL needs to be updated, Manu Sporny
May 21, 2008
- Re: following up on ISSUE-110, @src, Mark Birbeck
- Re: Reminder: regrets for this week, Ben Adida
- Re: Draft: Using RDFa to produce self-describing HTML, Shane McCarron
- Draft: Using RDFa to produce self-describing HTML, Steven Pemberton
- Re: Reminder: regrets for this week, Simone Onofri
- Reminder: regrets for this week, Steven Pemberton
- Re: following up on ISSUE-110, @src, Laurens Holst
- Re: following up on ISSUE-109, @cite, Laurens Holst
- RE: Real URLs for real things, Pete Johnston
- RE: Real URLs for real things, Hausenblas, Michael
- RE: Thursday Telecon, Hausenblas, Michael
- Thursday Telecon, Ben Adida
- following up on ISSUE-110, @src, Ben Adida
- following up on ISSUE-109, @cite, Ben Adida
May 15, 2008
- [Fwd: [uf-discuss] Fwd: [whatwg] Removing @rev], Manu Sporny
- Re: Real URLs for real things, Laurian Gridinoc
- meeting record: 2008-05-15 RDFa telecon, Ralph R. Swick
- Re: Real URLs for real things, Ben Adida
- Re: Real URLs for real things, Steven Pemberton
- RE: Real URLs for real things, Hausenblas, Michael
- Real URLs for real things, Steven Pemberton
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 15 May 2008, Mark Birbeck
- RE: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 15 May 2008, Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 15 May 2008, Simone Onofri
- quick update, Ben Adida
May 13, 2008
- Test Case #109: xml:base should be ignored in XHTML+RDFa 1.0, Manu Sporny
- Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor, Manu Sporny
- Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor, Shane McCarron
- Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor, Dave Beckett
- Re: ISSUE-7 : Response to Comments from Christian Hoertnagl, Christian Hoertnagl
- Re: [Fwd: New draft of TAG Finding: The Self-Describing Web], Shane McCarron
- Re: RDFa Primer ready for Working Group review, Ed Summers
- Re: RDFa in the FAO FNA we site, Manu Sporny
- RDFa in the FAO FNA we site, Sini, Margherita (KCEW)
- [RDFa TC ] Update, Hausenblas, Michael
- CfP PICKME, the 3rd ExpertFinder workshop, Lyndon Nixon
- RE: [Fwd: New draft of TAG Finding: The Self-Describing Web], Hausenblas, Michael
May 12, 2008
- [Fwd: New draft of TAG Finding: The Self-Describing Web], Shane McCarron
- Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor, Shane McCarron
- Re: librdfa tri-licensed to be compatible with Redland/Raptor, Dave Beckett
- Re: Preservation of namespaces in XML Literals (was Re: RDFa Test Harness), Ivan Herman
- Test Case #17 (v2): specifying named bnode relationships, Manu Sporny
- Re: Test Case #17: specifying named bnode relationships, Ivan Herman
- Preservation of namespaces in XML Literals (was Re: RDFa Test Harness), Manu Sporny
- Test Case #42 (v2): on IMG element @src specifies subject, not object, Manu Sporny
- Renaming Test Case #42 (was Re: Test Case #42: @src specifies subject on IMG, not object), Manu Sporny
- Re: Test Case #42: @src specifies subject on IMG, not object, Shane McCarron
- Test Case #42: @src specifies subject on IMG, not object, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #108: Specifying a plain literal with datatype="" and xml:lang preservation, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #107: Specifying a plain literal with datatype="", Manu Sporny
- Test Case #17: specifying named bnode relationships, Manu Sporny
May 10, 2008
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Shane McCarron
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #106: chaining with empty value in inner @rel, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #105 (v2): inner @rel is neither CURIE nor LinkType behavior, Manu Sporny
- Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1, Michael Schneider
- Re: Test Case #105: inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type behavior, Ben Adida
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Ben Adida
- Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1, Dan Brickley
- (Answer #2) Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Ivan Herman
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Ivan Herman
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Manu Sporny
- Re: Test Case #105: inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type behavior, Mark Birbeck
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Mark Birbeck
- Test Case #105: inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type behavior, Manu Sporny
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Ivan Herman
May 09, 2008
- Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1, Renato golin
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Ivan Herman
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Shane McCarron
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Ivan Herman
- Silly Question - do we need to explicitly say what to do with illegal URIs?, Shane McCarron
- Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1, Toby Inkster
- Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1, KANZAKI Masahide
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Shane McCarron
- Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1, Toby Inkster
- Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1, Renato Golin
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Ivan Herman
- Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1, Richard Cyganiak
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Shane McCarron
- Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1, Toby Inkster
- Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1, Renato Golin
- Re: an issue we need to address - bad @rel in the middle of a chain., Mark Birbeck
- RE: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1, Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, Ivan Herman
- Re: an issue we need to address - bad @rel in the middle of a chain., Shane McCarron
- ISSUE-120: Ambiguous Situation with nested @rel where inner @rel is neither CURIE nor link type, SWD Issue Tracker
- an issue we need to address - bad @rel in the middle of a chain., Ben Adida
May 08, 2008
- Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1, Toby A Inkster
- ISSUE-99 follow-up, Ben Adida
- Re: Serving and Validating XHTML+RDFa, Shane McCarron
- Serving and Validating XHTML+RDFa, James Pickering
- Re: comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute, Ivan Herman
- Re: comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute, Shane McCarron
- ISSUE-7 : Response to Comments from Christian Hoertnagl, Manu Sporny
- Re: comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute, Ivan Herman
- Last call announcement: CURIEs, Steven Pemberton
- Re: comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute, Shane McCarron
- a relevant reading: ARIA attributes, Ivan Herman
- RDFa Primer -- some comments, Roland Merrick
- comment/question on the latest RDFa editor's draft: role attribute, Ivan Herman
- Re: comments from PFWG on RDFa in XHTML spec, Ben Adida
- non-normative paragraph for the HTML fragment issue, ISSUE-113, Ben Adida
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 8 May 2008, Ben Adida
May 01, 2008
- Re: xsd:date or xsd:#date?, Shane McCarron
- xsd:date or xsd:#date?, Micah Dubinko
- Updated RDFa Syntax Editor's Draft, Shane McCarron
- meeting record: 2008-05-01 RDFa telecon, Ralph R. Swick
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC, Ben Adida
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC, Manu Sporny
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC, Toby A Inkster
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC, Ben Adida
- Regrets, Steven Pemberton
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC, Simone Onofri
- AW: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC, Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC, Ivan Herman
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC, Toby A Inkster
- Re: Telecon Agenda - Thursday 1 May 2008, 1500 UTC, Manu Sporny
|
|
