|
|
December 21, 2007
- Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Ben Adida
- Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Manu Sporny
- Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Manu Sporny
- Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Ivan Herman
- Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Ivan Herman
- Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Manu Sporny
- Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Ivan Herman
December 20, 2007
- meeting record: 2007-12-20 RDF-in-XHTML [RDFa] telecon, Ralph R. Swick
- Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules, Ben Adida
- Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Ben Adida
- Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules, Manu Sporny
- Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Manu Sporny
- Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Ivan Herman
- Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules, Manu Sporny
- Re: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Mark Birbeck
- Re: Small change to the relationship between head and body during parsing, Mark Birbeck
- Re: Small change to the relationship between head and body during parsing, Shane McCarron
- Re: Small change to the relationship between head and body during parsing, Ivan Herman
- Small change to the relationship between head and body during parsing, Mark Birbeck
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa, Mark Birbeck
- Re: Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules, Ivan Herman
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa, Ivan Herman
- RE: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Hausenblas, Michael
- telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Ben Adida
- Rethinking @src in the context of chaining rules, Ben Adida
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa, Mark Birbeck
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa, Ben Adida
December 19, 2007
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa, Mark Birbeck
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa, Hausenblas, Michael
- Test cases to review for tomorrow, Manu Sporny
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa, Ralph R. Swick
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa, Mark Birbeck
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa, Ivan Herman
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa, Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa, Ivan Herman
- [PROPOSAL] Named graphs in RDFa, Hausenblas, Michael
December 17, 2007
- An editorial remarks (was Re: CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics), Ivan Herman
- Re: CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics, Ivan Herman
- Re: CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics, Mark Birbeck
- [RDFa TC] Update regarding TC 46-70, Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: CURIE syntax thoughts + @instanceof semantics, Ivan Herman
- Test Case #70: @resource with relative URL, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #69: @href with relative URL, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #68: @about with relative URL, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #67: property in HEAD with no @about, @resource, or @href, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #66: @instanceof in HEAD, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #53: @instanceof with @resource and nothing else, with a subelement, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #52: @instanceof with @resource and nothing else, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #48: @instanceof with @about and @rel present, @rel creates new bnode, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #47: @instanceof with @rel and @resource present, no @about, Manu Sporny
December 12, 2007
- Re: Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax, Ivan Herman
- Re: Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax, Shane McCarron
- Re: Test methodology (was Re: Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax), Manu Sporny
- Re: Test cases for call tomorrow (minor correction), Manu Sporny
- Test cases for call tomorrow, Manu Sporny
- Test #51 (correction): @instanceof with a single @property, Manu Sporny
- Test methodology (was Re: Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax), Ivan Herman
- Test #64 (2nd correction): @about generates a proper triple when a safe CURIE is used, Manu Sporny
- Test #65: @rel properly connects triples generated using safe CURIEs, Manu Sporny
- Test #64 (corrected): @about generates a proper triple when a safe CURIE is used, Manu Sporny
- Re: Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax, Ivan Herman
- Re: Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax, Shane McCarron
- Re: Reserved values for @rel and @rev, Mark Birbeck
- Test #64: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and safe, non-prefixed CURIE syntax, Manu Sporny
- Test #63: @rel in <head> using reserved XHTML value and non-prefixed CURIE syntax, Manu Sporny
- Test #62: @rev in <head> using reserved XHTML value, Manu Sporny
- Test #61: @rel in <head> using reserved value, Manu Sporny
December 11, 2007
- attribute content fully conserved in browsers, even in XML mode, Ben Adida
- Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present, Mark Birbeck
- Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present, Shane McCarron
- Re: Reserved values for @rel and @rev, Shane McCarron
- Re: Reserved values for @rel and @rev, Ben Adida
- Re: Reserved values for @rel and @rev, Shane McCarron
- Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present, Ben Adida
- Re: Reserved values for @rel and @rev, Mark Birbeck
- Reserved values for @rel and @rev, Shane McCarron
- Re: Test Case Needed: simplest form, Manu Sporny
- RE: Test Case Needed: simplest form, Hausenblas, Michael
- Test Case Needed: simplest form, Shane McCarron
- Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present, Shane McCarron
- Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present, Ben Adida
- Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present, Ivan Herman
- Test #60: UTF-8 conformance, Manu Sporny
- Test #59: @instanceof with @href, @rel, @resource, and no @about, Manu Sporny
- Test #52: @instanceof with @resource and nothing else (re-review needed?), Manu Sporny
December 10, 2007
- Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present, Mark Birbeck
- Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present, Mark Birbeck
- Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present, Simone Onofri
- Re: @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present, Ivan Herman
- @profile is wrong solution for indicating that RDFa is present, Mark Birbeck
- Re: CURIE section in syntax spec, Mark Birbeck
- Re: CURIE section in syntax spec, Thomas Baker
- Re: CURIE section in syntax spec, Mark Birbeck
- CURIE section in syntax spec, Thomas Baker
- Re: first pass implementation of Mark's chaining rules, Ivan Herman
December 06, 2007
- Re: Two new test cases needed?, Mark Birbeck
- Test Case #58: hanging @rel can create multiple triples, @instanceof permutation, Manu Sporny
- meeting record: 2007-12-06 RDFa Task Force, Ralph R. Swick
- Test Case #57: hanging @rel can create multiple triples, Manu Sporny
- Test Case #56: @instanceof applies to @about on same element with hanging rel, Manu Sporny
- RE: Two new test cases needed?, Hausenblas, Michael
- On hold test cases, Manu Sporny
- Two new test cases needed?, Manu Sporny
- RE: action on white-space preservation in attributes, Hausenblas, Michael
- RE: telecon Thursday, 1600 UTC, Hausenblas, Michael
- action on white-space preservation in attributes, Ben Adida
December 03, 2007
- Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE, Sean B. Palmer
- Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE, Shane McCarron
- Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE, Sean B. Palmer
- Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE, Sean B. Palmer
- Warnings? (Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE), Ivan Herman
- Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE, Ivan Herman
- Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE, Benjamin Nowack
- Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE, Simone Onofri
- Re: RDFa RFE: No Mandated DOCTYPE, Karl Dubost
- OWL in RDFa (was Re: Understanding 'chaining'), Ivan Herman
|
|
