|
|
Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Ivan Herman
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Ivan Herman
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Ivan Herman
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Ivan Herman
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Ben Adida
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects, Ivan Herman
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Mark Birbeck
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects, Ben Adida
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Manu Sporny
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Knud Hinnerk Möller
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Dan Brickley
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Mark Birbeck
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Knud Hinnerk Möller
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects, Ben Adida
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects, Ivan Herman
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects, Mark Birbeck
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects, Ivan Herman
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Knud Hinnerk Möller
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42), Mark Birbeck
[RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type, Ben Adida
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type, Ben Adida
- RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type, Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type, Mark Birbeck
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type, Thomas Baker
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type, Diego Berrueta
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type, Niklas Lindström
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type, Mark Birbeck
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type, Ivan Herman
- Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type), Steven Pemberton
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type), Ben Adida
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type), Ivan Herman
- RE: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type), Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type), Ivan Herman
- RE: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type), Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type), Ivan Herman
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type), Mark Birbeck
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type), Niklas Lindström
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type), Keith Alexander
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type), Ben Adida
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type), Karl Dubost
[RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston, Ben Adida
- Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston, Ben Adida
- RE: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston, Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston, Mark Birbeck
[RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve, Ben Adida
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve, Ben Adida
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve, Shane McCarron
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve, Ben Adida
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve, Ivan Herman
Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Ben Adida
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Mark Birbeck
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Steven Pemberton
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Mark Birbeck
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Steven Pemberton
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Mark Birbeck
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Steven Pemberton
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Mark Birbeck
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Mark Birbeck
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Steven Pemberton
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Steven Pemberton
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Ivan Herman
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Shane McCarron
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Ben Adida
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Ben Adida
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Shane McCarron
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Mark Birbeck
- RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Hausenblas, Michael
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Niklas Lindström
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Mark Birbeck
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Steven Pemberton
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Niklas Lindström
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type, Mark Birbeck
|
|