logo       

Tunables for Linux hosts serving Win* clients (was Re: Re: DOS on Squid): msg#00436

org.user-groups.linux.philippine

Subject: Tunables for Linux hosts serving Win* clients (was Re: Re: DOS on Squid)

On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:49:24PM +0800, Ian Dexter R. Marquez wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:33:09 -0600,
> ramfree26-s8PdfxpoPdHk1uMJSBkQmQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <ramfree26-s8PdfxpoPdHk1uMJSBkQmQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > well in some scenarios it is not advisable to let windows update run freely.
> > in our company only approved patches/fixes are installed because not every
> > patch that microsoft releases is *guaranteed* to work.
> >
> Yes, having windows update running freely on workstations is not
> advisable. (Got a first-hand taste of how it craps on one of my
> servers -- a domain controller to boot -- which barfed errors after
> installing a service pack from the net.) What I do in my network is
> have *dedicated* machines (one for each OS: XP, 2000, 98SE) download
> all patches from Windows Update in a given schedule, then have those
> patches made available through the LAN in shared directories. That
> way, I have control over what patches to apply to the workstations.
> It's a bit tedious, though -- but it's gotta be done. We also get
> discs of cumulative patches and updates from MS, like the one
> containing security updates from Jan to May2004. It was given free, I
> think, in one of their gigs.
>
> What you probably want to do is block it through your firewall, AND
> through ACLs in squid. HTH.

True. iptables && squid-acl should do the trick.

However, consider this:

* Turn off useless (and memory/swap hogging) processes on your Win*
hosts, especially BACKGROUND procs:
+ Windows Update - don't run this, instead do as Ian said ;-)
+ Remote Desktop - who needs this anyway, you can always get ssh
(PuTTY for Win* folks)
+ Toys, Screensavers, Porn Dialers, Junk - especially WebShots
Desktop, since that gets gfxs from the Web, might even be spyware
+ Anti-Virii (Optional) - You might want to remove this to get
better performance, but that's entirely up to you--perhaps an even
better idea would be to setup anti-virii protection at the
transparent proxy level (both on HTTP and SMTP)

Other (more sinister) ideas:

* Convince your Win* users to use FOSS tools (OO instead of OfficeXP,
GIMP instead of Photoshop, less instead of more)

* Design a virus that insidously deletes Windows partitions
*piecemeal*, by slowly crosslinking partition entries, and blame it
on LongHorn not coming by 2005 (hehe ;)

Cheers,
Zakame

--
|=-------------ZAK B. ELEP (Registered Linux User #327585)-------------=|
|| Web: http://zakame.spunge.org GPG ID: 0xFA53851D ||
|| http://zakame.homelinux.org ICQ UIN: 33236644 ||
|| Location: Daet, Camarines Norte Running Linux 2.6 ||
|=----------1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D----------=|
Debian - When you've got better things to do than to fix a borken system

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
plug-sJCYDywXB4m9hMQLrSLElQC/G2K4zDHf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
.
To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
.
Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise