Re: Slackware compared to Debian

JM Ibanez wrote:

> Sorry, it was a subjective comparison, and I really should have
> clarified what I meant.
>
> What I really meant that, as a general rule, Slackware is slow to
> change compared to other distros. "Stability" in that most of the core
> packages are left at the "version that works", and that usually
> Slackware is slow to change.
>
> [ take w/ a grain of salt ]


you don't have to apologize, i'm just after the reason behind your 
statement
because i thought you might be using a "stress-test" software on some
gnu/linux services that i should try out. =)

anyway, i have the same reason why i prefer debian.(flame > /dev/null)



--
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
plug-sJCYDywXB4m9hMQLrSLElQC/G2K4zDHf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
.
To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
.
Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie