Re: Slackware compared to Debian

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:25:53 +0800, Ariz C. Jacinto
<acjacinto-LmMX2PHTAzDc+919tysfdA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> JM Ibanez wrote:
> 
> >Slackware
> >- Very stable
> >
> >
> 
> i'm just curious, how did you come up with this?

Sorry, it was a subjective comparison, and I really should have
clarified what I meant.

What I really meant that, as a general rule, Slackware is slow to
change compared to other distros. "Stability" in that most of the core
packages are left at the "version that works", and that usually
Slackware is slow to change.

[ take w/ a grain of salt ]



-- 
JM Ibanez
http://www.livejournal.com/~jmibanez/
http://www.mycgiserver.com/~butiki/
--
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
plug-sJCYDywXB4m9hMQLrSLElQC/G2K4zDHf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
.
To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
.
Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie