Re: (clug-talk) Voting Booth

Hi
Funny how meany people can not appriciate the fact, that ispite of linux 
being open source (hence any flaw can be very easily  found and exploited) 
still has far less exploitable/exploited flaws then vintage os, despite the 
source is being kept as top-secret-for-onone-eyes-only. And i dont think 
vintage has as large a base as vintage would like us to think. That number 
comes from sales-figures (oem vintage os). Now how long would a vintage-os 
last on a hard-disk after it gets home ??
Hehe, till i find my Linux cds :-)
Cheers
Szemir

Ps: Soorry , too mutch Balantines :-]

On Thursday 25 September 2003 22:47, you wrote:
> More secure, less secure...  Currently, one must place more value on the
> process of disclosure and patching since no software is totally secure.  In
> that vote, Open Source and Linux win hands down.  At least, it makes _me_
> feel more secure (knowing what's going on and what's been fixed).
>
> So I voted 'Yes'.  :-D
>
> Curtis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Anderson [mailto:list-server@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: September 25, 2003 10:36 PM
> To: clug-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: (clug-talk) Voting Booth
>
>
> http://www.securitypipeline.com/newslettervote.jhtml
>
> We might as well weigh in...