logo       

Re: Ruby Library: msg#00221

org.google.api.calendar

Subject: Re: Ruby Library

When we designed the .NET and java libs, we said: the client lib should
reflect the usage pattern of the target audience, not some default
dogma/spec.

So, given that, i would say: go wild...

Frank Mantek

On 9/23/06, Jason Persampieri <helgaorg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> So, I'm trying to re-write/extend my GCalendar Ruby library to include
> all Google services and options. I'm debating whether to try to 'copy
> exactly' the C#/Java interface, or if I should go ruby-wild and try to
> streamline the interface as much as possible.
>
> Anyone have an opinion?
>
>
> >
>




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise