|
Re: Ruby Library: msg#00221org.google.api.calendar
When we designed the .NET and java libs, we said: the client lib should reflect the usage pattern of the target audience, not some default dogma/spec. So, given that, i would say: go wild... Frank Mantek On 9/23/06, Jason Persampieri <helgaorg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So, I'm trying to re-write/extend my GCalendar Ruby library to include > all Google services and options. I'm debating whether to try to 'copy > exactly' the C#/Java interface, or if I should go ruby-wild and try to > streamline the interface as much as possible. > > Anyone have an opinion? > > > > > |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Ruby Library: 00221, Jason Persampieri |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Wrong version (need 1.0.5.27162): 00221, jwalton@xxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Thread: | Ruby Libraryi: 00221, Jason Persampieri |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Ruby Library: 00221, sanj |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |