|
Re: derivative works (was: Licensing question about the BSD): msg#00170org.gnu.discuss
Bruce Lewis wrote: [...] > intend to. I'm only refuting the assertion that if no lines of program > code are modified, it necessarily follows that there is no derivative > work. It's not a derivative work if it's a (non-derivative) compilation. You just can't have it both ways (derivative compilations based on some other preexisting compilation(s) aside for a moment). Hey, even RMS admitted it twice: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00390.html>. regards, alexander. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Licensing question about the BSD: 00170, Alexander Terekhov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 欲求不満な奥様をハメテ見ませんか: 00170, info |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: derivative works (was: Licensing question about the BSD)i: 00170, Bruce Lewis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Licensing question about the BSD: 00170, Alexander Terekhov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |