|
Re: Licensing question about the BSD: msg#00169org.gnu.discuss
Isaac wrote: [...] > Where I think he's completely out to lunch is in his interpretation of > first sale. Once again: I'm in good company. http://google.com/groups?selm=slrna7gh48.6s.isaac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <quote authors=Jeffrey Siegal, Isaac> :What about the first sale doctrine? Indeed, if users own their own :copies, including binary copies, of the software, than those users can :transfer those copies without complying with the GPL's requirements as :to source code access. Interesting. I really hadn't thought about that and my attempts to digest the implications on the fly are making my head hurt. I can't resolve the problems introduced by first sale without either making the user of GPL'd code a non owner or deciding that users really can transfer their copies, no matter what the GPL says. </quote> regards, alexander. -- http://google.com/groups?selm=4231A26A.DAE0EE71@xxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: derivative works (was: Licensing question about the BSD): 00169, Bruce Lewis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: derivative works (was: Licensing question about the BSD): 00169, Alexander Terekhov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: derivative works (was: Licensing question about the BSD)i: 00169, Alexander Terekhov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Licensing question about the BSD: 00169, Alexander Terekhov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |