|
Re: Licensing question about the BSD: msg#00109org.gnu.discuss
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@xxxxxx> writes: > Alexander Terekhov wrote: > [...] >> GNUtian dak is (mostly) right > > Gifts (in the context of this thread: accepted unilateral copyright > grants) also fall under '"first sale". Sure, as long as you have proof that you were made a present of a copy without attached conditions from the respective owner of the rights. For example, if the copyright owner himself put software up with a permission for downloading _without_ specifying that the use of downloaded copies was subject to conditions. > Price is irrelevant. Territorial hint: see the so called > Linux-Klausel in the most recent UrhG, my dear (plonked) GNUtian > dak. Sure. But the GPL is not a gift certificate. It is a licence. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Licensing question about the BSD: 00109, Alexander Terekhov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why are software patents wrong?: 00109, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Licensing question about the BSDi: 00109, Alexander Terekhov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Licensing question about the BSD: 00109, Alexander Terekhov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |