|
Re: Licensing question about the BSD: msg#00105org.gnu.discuss
John Hasler <john@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I wrote: >> In the US that is not a grant of the GPL. Copyright law explicitly >> gives you the right to run any program you own a copy of. > > David Kastrup writes: >> Where "own" means "lawfully acquired in an exchange of consideration from >> somebody with the right to offer the software". > > I think you are confounding first sale with § 117. "Sale". >> Copyright law does not give you the right to run programs you have >> stolen off a truck... > > In that case you do not own them. You merely possess them. > >> ...or obtained by [cr]acking into a server. > > In that case you do own the physical copies Wrong. You own the media, not the content. > and may have a right to run them, How would you have acquired that? > but when the copyright owner sues you the court will order > destruction of your copies Because of the content to which you have no claim of ownership. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Licensing question about the BSD: 00105, John Hasler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Licensing question about the BSD: 00105, John Hasler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Licensing question about the BSDi: 00105, John Hasler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Licensing question about the BSD: 00105, John Hasler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |