logo       

Re: Licensing question about the BSD: msg#00083

org.gnu.discuss

Subject: Re: Licensing question about the BSD

On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 13:27 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> [...]
> > > Drop a note to Edwards of debian-legal and ask for a copy of his "Will
> > > the Real GNU GPL Please Stand Up?"
> >
> > Stop distorting intentionally everything people write.
>
> Well, did you already read that Edwards article? What exactly did I
> distort? Start on quoting original.
>
> [... "the GPL is not a contract" ...]
>
> http://google.com/groups?selm=425BE5D1.B832B0A4@xxxxxx

You continue to make gratuitous insults and absurd information.
Nothing in there contradicts me. In fact, it contradicts you:

<<the owner of a particular copy or phonorecord lawfully made under
this title, or any person authorized by such owner, is entitled, without
the authority of the copyright owner, to sell or otherwise dispose of
the possession of that copy or phonorecord.>>
^^^^^^^^^

So you can do whatever with _YOUR_COPY_ but you still can't redistribute
copies of it.

Rui

--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
Gnu-misc-discuss@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise