Re: Is Hibernate right about the LGPL?

On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 12:49 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Lasse Reichstein Nielsen wrote:
> [...]
> > distribution is allowed by section 6.
> 
> Distribution is allowed by 17 USC 109. And [L]GPL is a joke.

Said allowed distribution is:

mv /a /b

not

cp /a /b

which isn't allowed by default in copyright law.

Oh, and IBM really doesn't seem to agree with you, and seems to be
pushing its (and FSFs, and !yours) view by claiming copyright
infringement from SCO for adding restrictions...

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
Gnu-misc-discuss@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss