|
Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN: msg#00148org.gnu.discuss
["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.advocacy.] On 2004-08-24, UNIX admin <tripivceta@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> If SUN is going to Open source Solaris, the *only* viable license IS >> the GPL, for the REASON that all the enterprise code could be put INTO >> LINUX. Yes, I know that sounds counter-intuitive, but that is the >> only way Open sourcing Solaris would work, because then the Linux >> people could port Solaris goodies into Linux and then Linux would run >> on every expensive highend SUN box. > > I hope that doesn't happen, because that would mean taking a perfectly good > OS and shoving it into a wannabe-UNIX with an identity crisis. Expensive highend SUN boxes are overrated to begin with. Plus, they simply don't scale well economically. -- vi isn't easy to use. ||| / | \ vi is easy to REPLACE. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN: 00148, Robin KAY |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN: 00148, Richard L. Hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUNi: 00148, UNIX admin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN: 00148, Richard L. Hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |