|
Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN: msg#00147org.gnu.discuss
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:19:56 +0200 "UNIX admin" <tripivceta@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> If SUN is going to Open source Solaris, the *only* viable license IS >> the GPL, for the REASON that all the enterprise code could be put INTO >> LINUX. Yes, I know that sounds counter-intuitive, but that is the >> only way Open sourcing Solaris would work, because then the Linux >> people could port Solaris goodies into Linux and then Linux would run >> on every expensive highend SUN box. > > I hope that doesn't happen, because that would mean taking a perfectly good > OS and shoving it into a wannabe-UNIX with an identity crisis. It's already happening (lxrun, and now Janus). How is more compatibility bad? /fc |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | NYC LOCAL: Thursday 26 August 2004 UNIGROUP: Tony Iams on Migrating From Windows NT 4.0: Linux or Windows Server?: 00147, secretary |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN: 00147, Chris Thompson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUNi: 00147, UNIX admin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: GPL'ing Solaris won't save SUN: 00147, Robin KAY |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |