Re: Google Code Hosting

Sam Liddicott <sam-zQGKLn5Wc3Lby3iVrkZq2A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...]
> Whether or not it "being no different than the requirement for the GPL
> or a GPL compatable license when it comes to software" is a material
> concern is a personal matter. [...]

FWIW, it's clearly different: the GPL can be used for manuals, but is 
not an FDL-compatible licence, because it does not allow addition of 
unremovable adverts and the other FDL problems.  So, requiring 
FDL-compatibility means requiring something less sharing-protective for 
the manuals than the GPL.  :-/

I'll leave it with http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2006/fdl#general
I can't find my Savannah-FDL links just now.

Hope that explains,
-- 
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble