|
Re: licensing question for a C++ template library: msg#00044org.fsf.europe.discussion
Thanks very much for your answers. > See the C++ run-time library > and the GNAT run-time library for examples (Ada is quite similar to > C++, at least in GCC's implementation). What do you call the C++ runtime library? I looked at the GNU STL, but all I saw was the GPL2 license unmodified. Also I couldn't find the license for the GNAT runtime library, any link? Can I ask you if you might help us fill the table in my first post? If I understand well, Simo's answer, though useful, wasn't specific to the case of a template library. Benoit
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: article on GPLv3, Linux kernel, and Devices Rigged to Malfunction: 00044, Ben Finney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: licensing question for a C++ template library: 00044, Florian Weimer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: licensing question for a C++ template libraryi: 00044, Florian Weimer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: licensing question for a C++ template library: 00044, Florian Weimer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |