|
Re: licensing question for a C++ template library: msg#00042org.fsf.europe.discussion
* Benoît Jacob: > I'm (co-)developing a C++ template library, Eigen: > http://edu.kde.org/kalzium/eigen/index.php > > We're wondering which license to choose for it. For template libraries, LGPL and GPL are almost equivalent because it's impossible to fulfill the relinking requirement without distributing full source code. Therefore, the FSF adds special exceptions to GPL-covered code instead. See the C++ run-time library and the GNAT run-time library for examples (Ada is quite similar to C++, at least in GCC's implementation). |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: article on GPLv3, Linux kernel, and Devices Rigged to Malfunction: 00042, simo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: article on GPLv3, Linux kernel, and Devices Rigged to Malfunction: 00042, Ben Finney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: licensing question for a C++ template libraryi: 00042, jacob-cwe3hIxInTJMRLEeWHYi1g |
| Next by Thread: | Re: licensing question for a C++ template library: 00042, Benoît Jacob |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |