Re: article on GPLv3, Linux kernel, and Devices Rigged to Malfunction

Alex Hudson <home-tAc6DklvUjjSUeElwK9/Pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I don't think anyone can sensibly argue
> that the requirement to publicise a shared secret code/key is not a term
> primarily concerned with post-violation compliance.

I'd say it's primarily concerned with pre-distribution decision making.

"Shall we tivoise?  Oh, looks like we can't."

-- 
Ciarán O'Riordan __________________ \ http://fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3
http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \  GPLv3 and other work supported by
http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \   Fellowship: http://www.fsfe.org