Re: licensing question for a C++ template library

> > What's vital for our lib is to be usable by GPL and LGPL software,   
> > the rest is
> > optional, but still a plus.
>
> I wouldn't call supporting proprietary software a "plus".
> To me, it isn't.
> So I'd like to convince you to stay with the GPL.

Here, by "the rest", I meant BSD-licensed software and other free  
software. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

Benoit

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.