|
Re: licensing question for a C++ template library: msg#00015org.fsf.europe.discussion
Many thanks, Simo! Just one thing, if I may ask: did I make it clear that our library is a _template_ library? What makes me fear I might not have been clear enough on this point, is that you say: > [2]: you must either use the library as a dynamically linked object or > provides at least binary .o files and the build system to recompile the > whole program if the LGPL library is statically compiled in. This doesn't seem to apply to a template library, right? Thanks again Benoit
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: licensing question for a C++ template library: 00015, simo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: licensing question for a C++ template library: 00015, simo |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: licensing question for a C++ template libraryi: 00015, simo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: licensing question for a C++ template library: 00015, simo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |