Hello.
Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Hello Kumar,
>>This makes sense to me since we are just increasing kernel code size
>>for code we would never use for an FSL_BOOKE part if we do it the
>>other way. I dont think its that much more messy with the ifdef's.
> Okay, if you're fine with this patch, is it possible that you include it
> into your tree?
>>If you want to do the other cleanup as well I've got no issue with
>>that, but we really should NOT build in support for 7450 into a
>>FSL_BOOKE kernel when reasonably avoidable.
> That's fine with me.
> As of the cleanups, well... looks to me some more patches will follow
> soon, kinda bugfixing ones rather than cleanups first :)
The most funny/stupd thing is that the patch existed since May but it never
went in:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=5531
> Thanks,
> Vitaly
WBR, Sergei
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
|
