|
|
Subject: Re: oprofile archive patch updated for oprofile cvs - msg#00020
List: linux.oprofile
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 05:35:47PM -0400, Will Cohen wrote:
> I have updated the old oprofile archive patch to work with the current
> version of oprofile in cvs. It adds an "archive:" specifier and a new
Nice and simple... does that project on savannah (I always forget the
name) have a generic copy file routine we can take? "cp" is surprisingly
painful to get right, never mind fast.
Other than that just the usual comments: cstyle, moving generic code
into generic libs etc.
Looks good to me.
regards
john
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
Was this page helpful?
Thread at a glance:
Previous Message by Date:
click to view message preview
accounting for I/O wait time
Hello,
I was wondering if it is possible to account for the time the CPU spends
waiting for I/O using oprofile, separate from the CPU idle time.
I will really appreciate if someone could give any pointers in this
regard.
Thanks,
Piyush
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
Next Message by Date:
click to view message preview
Re: accounting for I/O wait time
Piyush Shivam wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
At Duke University? You are just down the road from me.
I was wondering if it is possible to account for the time the CPU spends
waiting for I/O using oprofile, separate from the CPU idle time.
OProfile is pretty much oriented toward CPU-bound applications. OProfile
is great for finding which areas of code are CPU hogs.
You can sometimes find I/O bottlenecks with OProfile from the routines
that the kernel spends time in, e.g. processor spends a lot of time in
driver code to copy data between device and memory. However, if the CPU
isn't doing anything, then OProfile doesn't record much. The sampling
OProfile uses doesn't show where the processor sits idle. This is quite
possible with I/O when the processor is waiting for the device to
complete some action, e.g. a disk drive head seek or waiting for an
interrupt signalling that a network packet has arrived.
What kind of I/O are you talking about? Mass storage or networking? Or
some custom device? Do you have some simple benchmarks setup for
repeatable experiment and to keep the complexity managable?
I will really appreciate if someone could give any pointers in this
regard.
If you are looking at I/O for specific devices, something that measures
interverals of time required to get from one place in the code to
another might be more useful. Something like Linux Trace Toolkit (LTT)
that provided probes to specific places in the kernel might give more
information, http://www.opersys.com/LTT/. I haven't use LTT, so this is
just a guess.
-Will
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
Previous Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: accounting for I/O wait time
Thanks for your reply. Yes, I am at Duke. We are trying to do some
bottleneck analysis for some interesting applications which have bursty
I/O behavior. We are doing a whole system profile where a client connects
to the nfs server over Ethernet. The goal is to understand the behavior of
all the resources of the system so that one can see whats going on behind
the scenes.
The applications do have a lot of I/O happening.
Thanks for the pointer you gave me. I will have a look.
-Piyush
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, William Cohen wrote:
> Piyush Shivam wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi,
>
> At Duke University? You are just down the road from me.
>
> > I was wondering if it is possible to account for the time the CPU spends
> > waiting for I/O using oprofile, separate from the CPU idle time.
>
> OProfile is pretty much oriented toward CPU-bound applications. OProfile
> is great for finding which areas of code are CPU hogs.
>
> You can sometimes find I/O bottlenecks with OProfile from the routines
> that the kernel spends time in, e.g. processor spends a lot of time in
> driver code to copy data between device and memory. However, if the CPU
> isn't doing anything, then OProfile doesn't record much. The sampling
> OProfile uses doesn't show where the processor sits idle. This is quite
> possible with I/O when the processor is waiting for the device to
> complete some action, e.g. a disk drive head seek or waiting for an
> interrupt signalling that a network packet has arrived.
>
> What kind of I/O are you talking about? Mass storage or networking? Or
> some custom device? Do you have some simple benchmarks setup for
> repeatable experiment and to keep the complexity managable?
>
> > I will really appreciate if someone could give any pointers in this
> > regard.
>
> If you are looking at I/O for specific devices, something that measures
> interverals of time required to get from one place in the code to
> another might be more useful. Something like Linux Trace Toolkit (LTT)
> that provided probes to specific places in the kernel might give more
> information, http://www.opersys.com/LTT/. I haven't use LTT, so this is
> just a guess.
>
>
> -Will
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
Next Message by Thread:
click to view message preview
Re: oprofile archive patch updated for oprofile cvs
John Levon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 05:35:47PM -0400, Will Cohen wrote:
I have updated the old oprofile archive patch to work with the current
version of oprofile in cvs. It adds an "archive:" specifier and a new
Nice and simple... does that project on savannah (I always forget the
name) have a generic copy file routine we can take? "cp" is surprisingly
painful to get right, never mind fast.
It wasn't too painful given the current organization of oprofile. I will
see if savannah has suitable code for a generic copy. That is where
most of the pain (and FIXMEs) is right now.
Other than that just the usual comments: cstyle, moving generic code
into generic libs etc.
Looks good to me.
I will see what I can do to clean this up this week to make it suitable
for merging into the OProfile cvs.
Any thoughts on when the next release of OProfile will be?
-Will
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
|
|