Shantou,
The problem is if there is a '-' in the name field of the Portfile. The
current parsing mechanism
assumes that everything after the first '-' is the version. So
maxima-lisp-2.29 installs as
'maxima', version 'lisp-2.29'. The directory name under which the
Portfile lives is not involved.
Getting rid of the '-' in the name field fixes the problem. But this is
likely to come up again,
since fftw-3 has a '-' in its name too. It is probably being confused
with fftw, but the issue
has not come to the fore because no other port depends on fftw-3.
Greg
On Feb 29, 2004, at 4:15 PM, Shantonu Sen wrote:
Wait, is the problem having a port with "-" in the name? I count over
200 of those in darwinports right
now, so....
I guess if you really want you can rename the port. Anthony, can you
just remove the old
receipt? Should be in /opt/local/var/db/dports/receipts/, named
maxima- something
Shantonu
On Feb 29, 2004, at 11:30 AM, Gregory Wright wrote:
Ugh. I can rename the maxima-lisp port to maxima_lisp or maximalisp
if that will work
around the problem for now. I held off doing so before because the
consensus of the list
seemed to be that Port Images would be added soon. As always, the
last 10 percent of the
work takes 90 percent of the time....
What do people think? My preference is to use the underscore '_'.
Will that cause any
problems?
Best Wishes,
Greg
_______________________________________________
Darwinports mailing list
Darwinports@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/darwinports
|
