logo       

Re: platforms linux: msg#00544

Subject: Re: platforms linux

On Feb 25, 2004, at 4:24 PM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:

Hi all,

On Feb 25, 2004, at 12:45 PM, Waqar Malik wrote:

I think we should choose a platform that has a wide acceptance - i dunno whats up with linux now a days, but isnt redhat, debian or mandrake the most widely used distributions. Why not choose one of these as a reference.

I think RedHat now Fedora would be a good choice. Commercial companies tend to support that. And YellowDog is based on that as well. I guess we can take
a vote.

Let me ask the stupid question - given the diversity, why should we even try to define 'linux'? Why not just have:

platforms darwin linux-fedora linux-yellowdog linux-debian


There would need to be a line drawn somewhere, there are well over a hundred linux distros available.

--Larry

"I am only thirty.
And like the cat I have nine times to die."

Lawrence Sica
--------------------------------
lomion@xxxxxxx
http://www.citruspub.net
--------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>