osdir.com
mailing list archive
Mozy Online Backup: 2GB Free. Automatic. Secure.

Subject: Re: case-insensitive matching of portnames - msg#00265

List: os.opendarwin.darwinports

Date: Prev Next Index Thread: Prev Next Index
In the unlikely, but not impossible, (okay, pretty damn unlikely) case where you have two ports with the same name, different cases.

-landonf

On Nov 24, 2003, at 10:20 AM, Felix Kronlage wrote:

On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:12:47AM -0800, Landon Fuller wrote:

Because the dportsearch procedure takes a regex, and is used in a
number of locations to find a specific port (not just for searching for
a port), it can't be made case insensitive.

in which exact cases does it break? I looked in various places and tested
a bit around, but could not find anything.

-fkr
--
gpg-fingerprint: 076E 1E87 3E05 1C7F B1A0 8A48 0D31 9BD3 D9AC 74D0
Felix Kronlage | FKR-RIPE | http://www.hazardous.org/fkr/
fkr@{grummel.net|opendarwin.org} | http://www.opendarwin.org/~fkr/
_______________________________________________
Darwinports mailing list
Darwinports@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/darwinports


Was this page helpful?
Yes No
Thread at a glance:

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: case-insensitive matching of portnames

On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:12:47AM -0800, Landon Fuller wrote: > Because the dportsearch procedure takes a regex, and is used in a > number of locations to find a specific port (not just for searching for > a port), it can't be made case insensitive. in which exact cases does it break? I looked in various places and tested a bit around, but could not find anything. -fkr -- gpg-fingerprint: 076E 1E87 3E05 1C7F B1A0 8A48 0D31 9BD3 D9AC 74D0 Felix Kronlage | FKR-RIPE | http://www.hazardous.org/fkr/ fkr@{grummel.net|opendarwin.org} | http://www.opendarwin.org/~fkr/ pgpo1ObmgLUJp.pgp Description: PGP signature _______________________________________________ Darwinports mailing list Darwinports@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/darwinports

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: case-insensitive matching of portnames

On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:28:43AM -0800, Landon Fuller wrote: > In the unlikely, but not impossible, (okay, pretty damn unlikely) case > where you have two ports with the same name, different cases. recalling a "discussion" on darwinports@ from a few weeks ago (talking about the myODBC and MyODBC mess), we concluded that it makes no sense at all having two ports share the same name, with different cases, since that is just calling for trouble on case-insensitive filesystems (as hfs+ can be under certain circumstances). -fkr -- gpg-fingerprint: 076E 1E87 3E05 1C7F B1A0 8A48 0D31 9BD3 D9AC 74D0 Felix Kronlage | FKR-RIPE | http://www.hazardous.org/fkr/ fkr@{grummel.net|opendarwin.org} | http://www.opendarwin.org/~fkr/ pgpOgRH8iHuje.pgp Description: PGP signature _______________________________________________ Darwinports mailing list Darwinports@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/darwinports

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: case-insensitive matching of portnames

On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:12:47AM -0800, Landon Fuller wrote: > Because the dportsearch procedure takes a regex, and is used in a > number of locations to find a specific port (not just for searching for > a port), it can't be made case insensitive. in which exact cases does it break? I looked in various places and tested a bit around, but could not find anything. -fkr -- gpg-fingerprint: 076E 1E87 3E05 1C7F B1A0 8A48 0D31 9BD3 D9AC 74D0 Felix Kronlage | FKR-RIPE | http://www.hazardous.org/fkr/ fkr@{grummel.net|opendarwin.org} | http://www.opendarwin.org/~fkr/ pgpo1ObmgLUJp.pgp Description: PGP signature _______________________________________________ Darwinports mailing list Darwinports@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/darwinports

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: case-insensitive matching of portnames

On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:28:43AM -0800, Landon Fuller wrote: > In the unlikely, but not impossible, (okay, pretty damn unlikely) case > where you have two ports with the same name, different cases. recalling a "discussion" on darwinports@ from a few weeks ago (talking about the myODBC and MyODBC mess), we concluded that it makes no sense at all having two ports share the same name, with different cases, since that is just calling for trouble on case-insensitive filesystems (as hfs+ can be under certain circumstances). -fkr -- gpg-fingerprint: 076E 1E87 3E05 1C7F B1A0 8A48 0D31 9BD3 D9AC 74D0 Felix Kronlage | FKR-RIPE | http://www.hazardous.org/fkr/ fkr@{grummel.net|opendarwin.org} | http://www.opendarwin.org/~fkr/ pgpOgRH8iHuje.pgp Description: PGP signature _______________________________________________ Darwinports mailing list Darwinports@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/darwinports
Sign up for updates to this mailing list. email:
Loading Comments...
Home | News | Patents | Sitemap | FAQ | advertise

Advertising by