On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:54:43AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> could you please elaborate what's exactly wrong with qeth_verify_dev()?
>
> It has the same behaviour as in 2.4, and it looks correct to us...
2.4 was like this:
result = 0;
for (all in list) {
if (something)
result = QETH_VERIFY_IS_SOMETHING;
}
2.6 is:
result = 0;
for (all in list) {
result = (something)? QETH_VERIFY_IS_SOMETHING: foo();
}
Results are different if two cards are present on the list
and the function is asked to verify the first card.
-- Pete
|
