Hi,
sorry, I still don't see it...
> 2.4 was like this:
>
> result = 0;
> for (all in list) {
> if (something)
> result = QETH_VERIFY_IS_SOMETHING;
and it stops here if something...
> }
... and here follows a second loop over the list, looking for foo().
>
> 2.6 is:
>
> result = 0;
> for (all in list) {
> result = (something)? QETH_VERIFY_IS_SOMETHING:
foo();
and here it stops if something or foo()...
> }
...no second loop here.
Since it's either something or foo(), this looks like the same behaviour to
me.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Cornelia Huck
zLinux Developer
Tel.: +49-7031-16-4837, Mail: cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx
|
