Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21]

Then maybe it makes sense to enable e100 by default and not eepro100 ?

Felix. 

Jeff Garzik wrote:

>  
>
> My Official Story(tm) is currently
>
> * use e100
> * unless you really really want to use eepro100
>
> eepro100 in the kernel tree is essentially unmaintained.  One of the
> big reasons I merged e100 is that it has an active maintainer with
> full access to docs.
>
>         Jeff
>
>
>
>
>