On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:32:40AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:39:11 +0200
> Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > David S. Miller wrote:
> > > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:40:37 +0200
> > > Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >>Ok, now it's e100 driver, I will wait some hours to see if we have again
> > >>problems, thanks for your help.
> > >
> > > Any problems yet?
> >
> > It's ok now... I was waiting some hours (days) to see if it was really ok ;)
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
>
> No problem.
>
> Alan and Jeff, please note, executive summary:
>
> 1) 'eepro100' driver in 2.4.x + high end EFNET IRC server == crashes
> 2) same as #1 using 'e100' driver == works
My Official Story(tm) is currently
* use e100
* unless you really really want to use eepro100
eepro100 in the kernel tree is essentially unmaintained. One of the
big reasons I merged e100 is that it has an active maintainer with
full access to docs.
Jeff
|
