Hello,
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Ben Greear wrote:
> > I'm avoiding the arp_filter changes. The setup uses
> > asymmetric routing so better use arp_filter=0 or other
>
> arp_filter=1, right?
Right, my mistake, the routing is symmetric, arp_filter=1
is even recommended. Only rp_filter=1 can not be used as ARP
filter but you can use rp_filter=1 for IP filtering.
> I want to avoid strange(r) routing configurations, as I'm already
> using lots of routing tricks, and don't want to confuse matters
> more. I also turn on arp filtering to ensure the arps go out the
> right interface currently.
Right, you need just to bind to src IP (may be you can
avoid even that if you replace the prefsrc in your local routes).
> You should be able to easily test most of the changes your code
> if you have a machine with two ethernet interfaces and a loopback
> cable...
That is the problem, no 2.4 host with 2 NICs. Not soon.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
