At 08:29 PM 4/23/2003, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:41:56 -0700
>
> At 04:30 PM 4/23/2003, David S. Miller wrote:
> >Your stuff was unacceptable from the start because you didn't put
> >the ->owner into the protocol ops.
> But you didn't tell me that. You just said that it's "an ugly hack" without
> giving any other feedback.
>
>As you mention, Rusty said this.
>
> What about this though
>
>I'm sure Arnaldo will deal with the sys_accept() issues.
>But this is a minor issue, Arnaldo's stuff is architectually
>solid.
:)
Ok Dave. I'm not sure why you're _completely_ ignoring my arguments.
You should have just said from the beginning that you were going to
ignore what I have to say regarding that issue. At least I wouldn't
have wasted my time.
Sorry for bugging you.
Max
|
