Jason Lunz writes:
> Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx said:
> > Can you test the patch I sent for 5.0.43 with your equipment/setup?
>
> We have a winner! I called the driver with your patch 5.0.43-k1-ro1. I
> also removed all the cyclesoak lines; all they really show is that
> throughput is really sensitive to how much CPU time ksoftirqd gets.
>
> http://gtf.org/lunz/linux/net/perf/ is still the url.
Excellent!
We have a flat performance curve at ~350 kpps at any load and packet size
again. Of course this can be improved further.
I think Intel still did the hard work but left the "fine" tuning and testing
for us. :-)
I guess we propose the patch to maintainers.
Cheers
--ro
| 