logo       

Re: RFC: promote netfilter MARK value from IPv6 packets to sit packets: msg#00139

Subject: Re: RFC: promote netfilter MARK value from IPv6 packets to sit packets
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 03:57:27PM +0100, Erik Hensema wrote:

> In order to be able to provide QoS on tunneled IPv6 connections, I've
> created a simple patch (definately not ready for inclusion in the kernel,
> since it surely needs a configuration option) which promotes the netfilter
> MARK value from the IPv6 packets to the sit packets.
> Now I can mark packets using ip6tables, and on the ipv4 level I can still
> differentiate between the priorities. Problem solved, I'm happy ;-)

I like this patch.  I think we should make it a kernel configuration
option, but for all kind of tunnel interfaces.  Something like
'propagate NFMARK while tunneling' (or maybe 'preserve' instead of
'propagate' is better language?)

DaveM: Would this be acceptable?

> Erik Hensema (erik@xxxxxxxxxxx)

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>             http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

Attachment: pgpFx6BirUAQe.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>