<<Interfaces should NEVER change in patch level versions.
Just *DO NOT DO IT*.
>>I do agree on this.
This is a common complaint about linux kernel developers. And this always gives
an insecure feeling :-) for the device driver or kernel module programmers.
This was one of the issues in my earlier company/work and they have gone for
another OS.
Warm Regards
Arun
"Michael Richardson" wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Donald" == Donald Becker writes:
Donald> The drivers in the kernel are now heavily modified and have
significantly
Donald> diverged from my version. Sure, you are fine with having someone else
Donald> do the difficult and unrewarding debugging and maintainence work,
while
Donald> you work on just the latest cool hardware, change the interfaces and
are
Donald> concerned only with the current kernel version.
I agree strongly with Donald.
Interfaces should NEVER change in patch level versions.
Just *DO NOT DO IT*.
Go wild in odd-numbered.. get the interfaces right there.
But leave them alone afterward.
This is a fundamental tenant of being professional. Otherwise, the kernel
people are the biggest reason I've ever seen for using *BSD.
Microsoft is not the real enemy. Gratuitous change is.
] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com
Buy the best in Movies at http://www.videos.indiatimes.com
Change the way you talk. Indiatimes presents Valufon, Your PC to Phone service
with clear voice at rates far less than the normal ISD rates. Go to
http://www.valufon.indiatimes.com. Choose your plan. BUY NOW.
|
